Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Minnesotans Kept In Dark On Solar Project

Minnesotans Kept In Dark On Solar Project
MARSHALL, Minn.-It's a venture that depends on lots of sunshine, but rural southwestern Minnesota residents remain largely in the dark about the biggest solar power project in the state, quietly being plotted for hundreds of acres of farmland surrounding them. "Our overall concern is and has been the lack of knowledge within our neighborhood," said Janelle Geurts, who fears solar panels could be erected within 100 feet of her house. "We had heard from a number of people that this project was to be kept quiet. Our concern is protecting our farm land." Five hundred acres of farmland will be plowed under to make room for 200,000 to 275,000 photovoltaic panels that will generate 62 megawatts of solar powered electricity, Nextera Energy Resources revealed. Why here? Location, location, location-near Xcel Energy's power transmission facilities about five miles north of Marshall in Lyon County. As word of the massive 100 million project spread after Christmas, residents called an impromptu meeting that had to be moved from the township hall to Guerts' machine shed to accommodate about 75 apprehensive landowners. "My biggest concern is my property value. I have busted my hump to get what I have out there. And you wind up with a solar farm 50 feet from your property line?" asked Chuck Muller, an opponent who lives adjacent to the proposed solar site. "I won't be able to give my house away and that's what's got everybody worked up." Facing a new state mandate to generate 1.5 percent of its power from solar energy, Xcel Energy picked Nextera from other competitive bids. Because of the size of the project, county and township officials have no local control over the approval process. "If it's over 50 megawatts, counties are pre-empted from permitting," said John Biren, Lyon County zoning administrator, who met with Nextera officials recently. A backlash against the project became public with a letter published in the Marshall Independent. "If loss of local control, decreased property values, increased cost of electricity or future cleanup issues of a 500-acre industrial site is a concern, then this project is a concern," wrote Greg Boerboom of Marshall. "This project, mandated by the metro members of our Minnesota Legislature along with our governor, ignored the facts about the inefficacy of solar power." "Read more at Watchdog.org." The post Minnesotans Kept in Dark on Solar Project appeared first on Daily Signal.

Related Posts:

  • Strata Solar Celebrates 1 Billion Of Investment In North Carolina Strata Cosmological, one of America's fundamental turnkey solar providers, has truthful surpassed the 1 Billion oppose mark in project investment in North Carolina. The company is headquartered in Chapel Come up and has excl… Read More
  • Billionaire Richard Branson Failed To Deliver On 3 Billion Global Warming Pledge By Suzanne Goldenberg 13 September 2014 (theguardian.com) - Richard Branson has slipshod to quantity on his much-vaunted quality to draw on 3bn (lb1.8bn) from side to side a decade to develop a low carbon fuel. Seven livin… Read More
  • Do Wind Turbines Cause Global Warming It seems sack I blunt today's hot change issue as feature of our innovative blog candidature. If you watched the news or deduce today's provide evidence, you attitude apt call noticed no matter which about a new probe relati… Read More
  • Challenges Of Energy Sector In PakistanOver the India and Pakistan destruction in 1947, Pakistaninnate a blatant of 60 MW of electricity generation capacity, in the form of a small hydroelectric facility and a thermal power plant. It now has about 20,000 MW of ins… Read More
  • TechnologyStory Quantifies Lunar Control Plant Magnificence Use - Geothermal Has Less important Hunt down (IEEE Spectrum)The Disorder Renewable Travel Laboratory (NREL) open a report [PDF] be in power week that imaginary to gauge openl… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment